"Her way of conceiving architecture has no historical continuity whatsoever – indeed, to use her own words, a building is the equivalent of the diagram of space used to abstractly describe the daily activities that take place there. No lingering on complex and contradictory processes of design in the classical sense, no dependency on historical archetypes, not even unconsciously. The sense of a physical relation with space that we find in her work cannot be assimilated with the experience of traditional architecture, but with something that depends in the purest and simplest way on abstract spatial forms." (T. Ito).